The discussion starts with the concept of globalization and its relation to capitalism. Coskun provides a theoretical framework, defining globalization as the breaking down of national borders to allow the flow of goods, services, capital, and labor, driven by technological advancements and a reduction in production costs. He argues that globalization is an objective reality resulting from capitalism’s development, not a subjective choice. Coskun explains how globalization affects different countries, with developed nations benefiting more than those partially integrated to or excluded from globalization. He also discusses the historical role of the nation-state and how globalization is changing its relevance.

Mariana presents an argument for a shift towards globally-oriented political strategies. She explains that many state functions, including economic, political, and social, are now being conducted at a global level through institutions like the IMF, World Bank, and G20. Mariana suggests that this globalization creates both challenges and opportunities, as the system is more fragile and interdependent. She proposes two key steps for organizations: allocating resources for international coordination and building mandates for international organization. Mariana emphasizes the need for global-level strategy checking and analysis to ensure local actions are effective and relevant in the broader context.

With the rest of the participants joining in the conversation, we discuss the balance between global and local perspectives in social movements, the role of the nation-state in the face of rising nationalism, Global South leadership, and how to effectively build a translocal viewpoint and organizational culture.